link1323 link1324 link1325 link1326 link1327 link1328 link1329 link1330 link1331 link1332 link1333 link1334 link1335 link1336 link1337 link1338 link1339 link1340 link1341 link1342 link1343 link1344 link1345 link1346 link1347 link1348 link1349 link1350 link1351 link1352 link1353 link1354 link1355 link1356 link1357 link1358 link1359 link1360 link1361 link1362 link1363 link1364 link1365 link1366 link1367 link1368 link1369 link1370 link1371 link1372 link1373 link1374 link1375 link1376 link1377 link1378 link1379 link1380 link1381 link1382 link1383 link1384 link1385 link1386 link1387 link1388 link1389 link1390 link1391 link1392 link1393 link1394 link1395 link1396 link1397 link1398 link1399 link1400 link1401 link1402 link1403 link1404 link1405 link1406 link1407 link1408 link1409 link1410 link1411 link1412 link1413 link1414 link1415 link1416 link1417 link1418 link1419 link1420 link1421 link1422 link1423 link1424 link1425 link1426 link1427 link1428 link1429 link1430 link1431 link1432 link1433 link1434 link1435 link1436 link1437 link1438 link1439 link1440 link1441 link1442 link1443 link1444 link1445 link1446 link1447 link1448 link1449 link1450 link1451 link1452 link1453 link1454 link1455 link1456 link1457 link1458 link1459 link1460 link1461 link1462 link1463 link1464 link1465 link1466 link1467 link1468 link1469

Ethereum Classic 51 Attack: Okex Crypto Exchange Suffers 56 Million Loss Contemplates Delisting ETC

Ethereum Classic 51% Attack: Okex Crypto Exchange Suffers $5.6 Million Loss, Contemplates Delisting ETC

Ethereum Classic 51% Attack: Okex Crypto Exchange Suffers $5.6 Million Loss, Contemplates Delisting ETC

Cryptocurrency exchange Okex reveals it suffered the $5.6 million loss as a result of the double-spend carried out by the attacker(s) in Ethereum Classic 51% attack. Okex says it fully absorbed the loss as per its user-protection policy while insisting that the attack did not cause any loss to the platform’s users.

Also as part of its immediate responses to the attack, the OKEx team said the “exchange had suspended deposits and withdrawals of ETC to prevent further losses.”

A total of five accounts on the exchange had been used in the attack and now the Okex team says it has “suspended the five accounts to prevent further incidents.”

Immediately following the attack, ETC developers initially downplayed the event by characterising it as an “accident.” At the time, the developers doubted if any major double-spend attacks had occurred.

However, an investigation by a blockchain analysis firm later revealed the “accident” was, in fact, a 51% attack, and that $5.6 million had been stolen. At the same time, reports linking Okex wallets to the incident also surfaced.

Responding to these reports in a blog, the Okex team clarifies that the “exchange was only involved in that the attacker(s) used the exchange to purchase and trade ETC.”

The Okex team also believes the exchange was targeted probably because it “provides excellent ETC liquidity, seeing some of the largest ETC transaction volumes in the industry.”

The blog report suggests that “the attacker(s) likely calculated that they would be able to relatively easily and promptly trade large amounts of ETC on OKEx.”

Regarding more steps it will take, the Okex team said:

“Additionally — given OKEx’s responsibility to protect users from similar incidents that threaten the security of their funds — the exchange will consider delisting ETC, pending the results of the Ethereum Classic community’s work to improve the security of its chain.”

However, the blog post does not give a specific time frame when the ETC community is expected to improve this.

Meanwhile, in his comments on the attack, Tim Ismilyaev, CEO and Founder at Mana Security, says such incidents are “common for less popular blockchains, ETC can’t fix it without significant amendments into their architecture.”

Ismilyaev also offers his view on why Okex still suffered the loss even after the ETC team had advised exchanges to halt deposits and withdrawals soon after the attack. Ismilyaev explains:

ETC’s advice was released after the attack occurred, so Okex couldn’t stop the withdrawal of stolen funds. Noteworthy, the attacker most likely knew how Okex risk management systems work. It allowed him to withdraw stolen funds without being detected. That’s why he deliberately traded assets only on OKEX rather than splitting funds across multiple exchanges to hedge the risks.

With one exchange, Kucoin having delisted ETC margin trading from its platform, the ETC team faces increased pressure to address the security challenges or face more delistings.

Can the ETC team solve the security challenges in time before another delisting? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.