link1988 link1989 link1990 link1991 link1992 link1993 link1994 link1995 link1996 link1997 link1998 link1999 link2000 link2001 link2002 link2003 link2004 link2005 link2006 link2007 link2008 link2009 link2010 link2011 link2012 link2013 link2014 link2015 link2016 link2017 link2018 link2019 link2020 link2021 link2022 link2023 link2024 link2025 link2026 link2027 link2028 link2029 link2030 link2031 link2032 link2033 link2034 link2035 link2036 link2037 link2038 link2039 link2040 link2041 link2042 link2043 link2044 link2045 link2046 link2047 link2048 link2049 link2050 link2051 link2052 link2053 link2054 link2055 link2056 link2057 link2058 link2059 link2060 link2061 link2062 link2063 link2064 link2065 link2066 link2067 link2068 link2069 link2070 link2071 link2072 link2073 link2074 link2075 link2076 link2077 link2078 link2079 link2080 link2081 link2082 link2083 link2084 link2085 link2086 link2087 link2088 link2089 link2090 link2091 link2092 link2093 link2094 link2095 link2096 link2097 link2098 link2099 link2100 link2101 link2102 link2103 link2104 link2105 link2106 link2107 link2108 link2109 link2110 link2111 link2112 link2113 link2114 link2115 link2116 link2117 link2118 link2119 link2120 link2121 link2122 link2123 link2124 link2125 link2126 link2127 link2128 link2129

Not Right Time to Regulate Bitcoin: American Institute For Economic Research

Not Right Time to Regulate Bitcoin: American Institute For Economic Research

    

“Now Is Not the Right Time to Regulate Bitcoin”

The American Institute For Economic Research (AIER) senior research fellow Max Gulker argued in a recent column entitled “Now Is Not the Right Time to Regulate Bitcoin” that it is not a practical approach towards technological innovation to overregulate Bitcoin and digital currencies at the moment. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin, Ethereum Classic and NEM are all at its early stage in development. Bitcoin is yet to deal with its scaling issues that have substantially increased transaction fees for users. Bitcoin fee estimation service providers including the 21 Inc Bitcoin Fees are recommending users a $2 fee or a 420 satoshis per byte fee to have transactions verified and confirmed by miners relatively fast.

Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies and Blockchain networks are also dealing with their own scaling issues and developing infrastructures for their growing user base and clientele. Ethereum and Ripple, in particular, are in partnership with some of the world’s largest financial institutions and conglomerates to utilize smart contracts to settle transactions in an autonomous, transparent and secure manner. Hence, at this critical juncture, it would be significantly impractical for governments to step in and overregulate the cryptocurrency sector. Minimal and efficient regulatory frameworks have helped the global cryptocurrency market to mature. For instance, Japan’s legalization of Bitcoin led to an explosive growth in demand for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies like Ripple and NEM.

Regulatory frameworks damaging to startups

However, Gulker explained that regulatory frameworks such as New York’s BitLicense can be damaging to startups both financially and in the technical sense. As regulatory frameworks like the NY BitLicense require startups to pay a large licensing fee and keep tight records of their users, they create difficult ecosystems for both small and large-scale startups. Even startups that have millions of users and that have secured millions of early-stage funding such as Shapeshift have suspended services in New York due to impractical regulations. Emphasizing the damage over-regulation from governments can inflict on startups and the global cryptocurrency industry,

Gulker wrote:

”Cryptocurrencies are still in a very early period of innovation and adoption. It would be a shame for a disproportionate amount of that innovative effort to go toward satisfying regulators’ demands rather than users’ wants and needs. The true risk lies in over-regulating cryptocurrencies now.”

Ultimately, Gulker noted that governments should take a wait-and-see approach instead and implement the practical yet minimal regulation on the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency industry. When the technology, market and industry start to evolve, governments can step in to regulate the market for general consumers and investors. “Those who believe in the benevolent power of such regulation should remember the inevitable rent-seeking behavior to which it leads, where businesses lobby government for favorable regulation. So it might be best for regulators to take a wait-and-see approach,” added Gulker.

Chuck Reynolds
Contributor
Please click either Link to Learn more about – Bitcoin.

Alan Zibluk Markethive Founding Member