link1764 link1765 link1766 link1767 link1768 link1769 link1770 link1771 link1772 link1773 link1774 link1775 link1776 link1777 link1778 link1779 link1780 link1781 link1782 link1783 link1784 link1785 link1786 link1787 link1788 link1789 link1790 link1791 link1792 link1793 link1794 link1795 link1796 link1797 link1798 link1799 link1800 link1801 link1802 link1803 link1804 link1805 link1806 link1807 link1808 link1809 link1810 link1811 link1812 link1813 link1814 link1815 link1816 link1817 link1818 link1819 link1820 link1821 link1822 link1823 link1824 link1825 link1826 link1827 link1828 link1829 link1830 link1831 link1832 link1833 link1834 link1835 link1836 link1837 link1838 link1839 link1840 link1841 link1842 link1843 link1844 link1845 link1846 link1847 link1848 link1849 link1850 link1851 link1852 link1853 link1854 link1855 link1856 link1857 link1858 link1859 link1860 link1861 link1862 link1863 link1864 link1865 link1866 link1867 link1868 link1869 link1870 link1871 link1872 link1873 link1874 link1875 link1876 link1877 link1878 link1879 link1880 link1881 link1882 link1883 link1884 link1885 link1886 link1887 link1888 link1889 link1890 link1891 link1892 link1893 link1894 link1895 link1896 link1897 link1898 link1899 link1900 link1901 link1902 link1903 link1904 link1905 link1906 link1907 link1908 link1909 link1910

Breaking: SEC Will Review Decision of Winklevoss Bitcoin ETF Rejection

Breaking: SEC Will Review Decision of Winklevoss Bitcoin ETF Rejection

The securities and exchange commission has granted a request by the Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. to review its decision of disapproving the bitcoin ETF back in March this year. According to a document signed by Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary at the SEC:

“The petition of BZX for review of the Division’s action to disapprove the proposed rule change by delegated authority be GRANTED; and It is further ORDERED that any party or other people may file a statement in support of or in opposition to the action made pursuant to delegated authority on or before May 15, 2017.”

Aleman is the person who, through delegated authority, made the decision on March the 10th which some in the bitcoin community saw as an intentional slap. In a fairly angry article back then, I wrote

“How can one man have so much power? We were told there will be a vote, but apparently, the SEC commissioners didn’t think this decision was important, delegating it to Aleman. Then, what’s the point of the commissioners?… Delegating this decision to a faceless bureaucrat is an insult. For them to hide behind an Assistant Secretary, not even a Secretary, is an intentional slap.

The decision document mentions a specific date, data analyzed by the 28th of February. That’s almost two weeks ago. Could he have not released the decision then? Did he have to allow so much speculation? Was it an intentional insult to the entire bitcoin community for this clearly already long ago made decision to be released at the very last hour? Who knew of the decision before it was released? Did any of them trade the market?”

Aleman’s reasons for rejecting the ETF was because he wanted a surveillance sharing agreement between exchanges and because he said much of the trading was carried out in unregulated Chinese bitcoin exchanges.

The latter part was out of date even at the time of the decision. PBoC has moved in, laying out some red lines for Chinese exchanges. Aleman further said Gemini lacks liquidity, but that’s mainly because traders naturally go to exchanges with futures and margins, two necessary facilities that CFTC continues to deny to regulated American exchanges such as Gemini and Coinbase.

It is surprising, however, that the decision is now to be reviewed. Even more so because the person who rejected the ETF, Aleman, has approved the review of his own decision. It is still too early to say how this review will be carried out, but one thing I hope we can say for sure is that Aleman will have no further part in any of it.

That’s for obvious reasons which do not even need to be stated. One can’t review their own decision in an institutional context. It’s like carrying a judicial appeal in front of the same judge who clearly has already reached a decision against you.

This review should be carried out at the commissioners’ level. To them, I say what I said just a day before Aleman’s decision, a day when I thought it was the commissioners who were to decide, specifically the acting chairman of the SEC:

“Dr. Piwowar, open the doors for business. Welcome innovation. And not by default approval. Stand in front of the world and show that America has two parties, show that this administration means free market capitalism, hail the geniuses who bring new things to this world, lift the spirits of this great nation.”

Chris Corey CMO MarketHive Inc

Andrew Quentson on 25/04/2017

 

Alan Zibluk Markethive Founding Member